<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laser TV Revolution No. 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laser-tv.org/2007/laser-television-revolution-no-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laser-tv.org/2007/laser-television-revolution-no-2/</link>
	<description>Laser TV News, Reviews, Release Dates, Previews, Guides &#38; Media</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laser-Television.com</title>
		<link>http://laser-tv.org/2007/laser-television-revolution-no-2/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Laser-Television.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laser-tv.org/?p=11#comment-20</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Of course, if the robotic technology is not there, remote surgery is not possible. Outside of the sense of "touch" I think surgeons primarily rely on their vision when performing operations, and probably more so when making diagnoses. Until virtual reality makes some significant advances, HD monitors will be the only substitute for live interaction. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If laser tv's claims of reproducing images at 90% of reality are true, video conferencing and remote video will explode.  We'll finally have a reason for videophones, etc. Laser TV and a new generation of high-quality video just might validate telemedicine, making it more common, and ultimately encouraging the development and revolutionizing of this field.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, if the robotic technology is not there, remote surgery is not possible. Outside of the sense of &#8220;touch&#8221; I think surgeons primarily rely on their vision when performing operations, and probably more so when making diagnoses. Until virtual reality makes some significant advances, HD monitors will be the only substitute for live interaction. </p>
<p>If laser tv&#8217;s claims of reproducing images at 90% of reality are true, video conferencing and remote video will explode.  We&#8217;ll finally have a reason for videophones, etc. Laser TV and a new generation of high-quality video just might validate telemedicine, making it more common, and ultimately encouraging the development and revolutionizing of this field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MedTech</title>
		<link>http://laser-tv.org/2007/laser-television-revolution-no-2/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>MedTech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laser-tv.org/?p=11#comment-19</guid>
		<description>while i agree that this will bring the realism / fake gap even more blurred, i'm not exactly sure how just the display will make remote surgery more prevalent or successful.

don't get me wrong, i'm all for it, i just think other types of technology will make it a real "revolution"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while i agree that this will bring the realism / fake gap even more blurred, i&#8217;m not exactly sure how just the display will make remote surgery more prevalent or successful.</p>
<p>don&#8217;t get me wrong, i&#8217;m all for it, i just think other types of technology will make it a real &#8220;revolution&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
