<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thick in Size, Thin on Info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laser-tv.org/2008/thick-in-size-thin-on-info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laser-tv.org/2008/thick-in-size-thin-on-info/</link>
	<description>Laser TV News, Reviews, Release Dates, Previews, Guides &#38; Media</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed George</title>
		<link>http://laser-tv.org/2008/thick-in-size-thin-on-info/#comment-2458</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laser-tv.org/?p=50#comment-2458</guid>
		<description>The aspect ratio of these sets is 9:16.
a 65" diag reqires a 56" wide screen. Add a 2" frame and it will be at most 60" wide</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The aspect ratio of these sets is 9:16.<br />
a 65&#8243; diag reqires a 56&#8243; wide screen. Add a 2&#8243; frame and it will be at most 60&#8243; wide</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S</title>
		<link>http://laser-tv.org/2008/thick-in-size-thin-on-info/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>John S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laser-tv.org/?p=50#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>The current Mitsubishi 65" TVs are 58.2" wide and the 73" TVs are 65.2" wide, so 'd guess the same size LTVs would have about the same widths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current Mitsubishi 65&#8243; TVs are 58.2&#8243; wide and the 73&#8243; TVs are 65.2&#8243; wide, so &#8216;d guess the same size LTVs would have about the same widths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee H</title>
		<link>http://laser-tv.org/2008/thick-in-size-thin-on-info/#comment-1742</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laser-tv.org/?p=50#comment-1742</guid>
		<description>Has anyone seen anything about the physical width size of the units (not just the depth and diagonal screen size)?  The reason that I ask is because I only have a 65" wide space available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone seen anything about the physical width size of the units (not just the depth and diagonal screen size)?  The reason that I ask is because I only have a 65&#8243; wide space available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
