Comments on: Updated LaserVue News and Pics http://laser-tv.org/2008/updated-laservue-news-and-pics/ Laser TV News, Reviews, Release Dates, Previews, Guides & Media Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:30:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Schlong http://laser-tv.org/2008/updated-laservue-news-and-pics/#comment-1469 Schlong Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:40:10 +0000 http://laser-tv.org/?p=47#comment-1469 73 inches. at least boost it up to 75. I want a monster! 73 inches. at least boost it up to 75. I want a monster!

]]> By: Vygantas http://laser-tv.org/2008/updated-laservue-news-and-pics/#comment-1454 Vygantas Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:59:16 +0000 http://laser-tv.org/?p=47#comment-1454 Any laser pc displays in the future?* Any laser pc displays in the future?*

]]> By: Vygantas http://laser-tv.org/2008/updated-laservue-news-and-pics/#comment-1453 Vygantas Sun, 08 Jun 2008 07:58:51 +0000 http://laser-tv.org/?p=47#comment-1453 Any plasma pc displays in the future? Any plasma pc displays in the future?

]]> By: LaserFan http://laser-tv.org/2008/updated-laservue-news-and-pics/#comment-1452 LaserFan Sun, 08 Jun 2008 00:11:44 +0000 http://laser-tv.org/?p=47#comment-1452 PLEASE Mitsubishi! Make at least a 57 inch Laser Vue. It is good to have a selection to appeal to all of us. The larger size TV's are too big for some media niche locations in contemporary homes. At least one size smaller than a 65 inch is needed. PLEASE Mitsubishi! Make at least a 57 inch Laser Vue. It is good to have a selection to appeal to all of us. The larger size TV’s are too big for some media niche locations in contemporary homes.
At least one size smaller than a 65 inch is needed.

]]> By: LaserTV http://laser-tv.org/2008/updated-laservue-news-and-pics/#comment-1376 LaserTV Wed, 28 May 2008 06:56:25 +0000 http://laser-tv.org/?p=47#comment-1376 Mitisubishi probably realized it would be suicidal to introduce a "gimmicky" RPTV in the under 65-inch TV market, which is already flooded with scores of affordable flat screen TVs. A first production LaserVue isn't going to be cheap, so I think it's brilliant of Mitsubishi to initially target the big screen market, where the consumers don't necessarily care about cabinet depths or getting the best overall value. If LaserVue delivers the stunning picture quality it promises, look for the manufacturing costs of laser engines to fall in the next year or so, making it commercially possible for a mid-sized Laser RPTVs to be an alternative to PDP and LCD. Mitisubishi probably realized it would be suicidal to introduce a “gimmicky” RPTV in the under 65-inch TV market, which is already flooded with scores of affordable flat screen TVs. A first production LaserVue isn’t going to be cheap, so I think it’s brilliant of Mitsubishi to initially target the big screen market, where the consumers don’t necessarily care about cabinet depths or getting the best overall value. If LaserVue delivers the stunning picture quality it promises, look for the manufacturing costs of laser engines to fall in the next year or so, making it commercially possible for a mid-sized Laser RPTVs to be an alternative to PDP and LCD.

]]> By: pligg.com http://laser-tv.org/2008/updated-laservue-news-and-pics/#comment-1369 pligg.com Mon, 26 May 2008 23:16:01 +0000 http://laser-tv.org/?p=47#comment-1369 <strong>uh... laser based tvs?...</strong> why your next television might not be lcd, plasma or even oled... say hello to lasers!... uh… laser based tvs?…

why your next television might not be lcd, plasma or even oled… say hello to lasers!…

]]> By: The Wicke Man http://laser-tv.org/2008/updated-laservue-news-and-pics/#comment-1333 The Wicke Man Mon, 19 May 2008 15:12:53 +0000 http://laser-tv.org/?p=47#comment-1333 Like Paul said " I want something smaller too ". I want at least 50 inches.. 65 is to big to start people out with. Like Paul said ” I want something smaller too “. I want at least 50 inches.. 65 is to big to start people out with.

]]> By: Me http://laser-tv.org/2008/updated-laservue-news-and-pics/#comment-1294 Me Tue, 13 May 2008 22:24:20 +0000 http://laser-tv.org/?p=47#comment-1294 Hmmm ... 10" depth. I understand these are based on DLP rear projection technology, but the hype was that these were to be slimmer, like plasma and LCD, or slightly thicker. Don't see too many people wanting to try to hang something that will stick 10" out on their walls. Hmmm … 10″ depth. I understand these are based on DLP rear projection technology, but the hype was that these were to be slimmer, like plasma and LCD, or slightly thicker. Don’t see too many people wanting to try to hang something that will stick 10″ out on their walls.

]]> By: Paul http://laser-tv.org/2008/updated-laservue-news-and-pics/#comment-1264 Paul Wed, 07 May 2008 18:25:20 +0000 http://laser-tv.org/?p=47#comment-1264 65" and 73" sizes? Those are huge, I hope they won't be the only sizes offered. I've been following lazer tv's since I first heard of them. I want to replace my current big screen and I'm waiting (im)patiently for laser to be released to do so. But there is no way a tv that big would be appropriate for my condo. My current is 47" (wide screen) and I would want something similar. 65″ and 73″ sizes? Those are huge, I hope they won’t be the only sizes offered. I’ve been following lazer tv’s since I first heard of them. I want to replace my current big screen and I’m waiting (im)patiently for laser to be released to do so. But there is no way a tv that big would be appropriate for my condo. My current is 47″ (wide screen) and I would want something similar.

]]>